explanation of terminology and benefits

 

 

When viewing various screens and/or reports you will notice some (or all) of these indicators:

 

Chef-de-Race Sires are sires that are used in the dosage theory (utilizing the Dr. Roman method of calculation). These sires are designated on the Pedigree report with indicant letters after their name: B (Brilliant); C (Classic): I (Intermediate); S (Solid); P (Professional).  Split chefs will be shown with dual indicators.  A chef split between Brilliant and Classic will appear as B/C, etc. Note: This is the only subjective item in the entire program!

 

Coefficient of Inbreeding (if applicable) appears on the Pedigree report compares the percent of inbreeding of the subject horse, to the remainder of the removes 5-6-7 or infinity.

 

Color Coding is a convenient visual aid within this program.  Some names on your Pedigree report may be in blue or red. This simply denotes that the duplicated ancestor is either a sire (blue), or a dam (red). You may sometimes disable this feature, but with it enabled you can see at a glance if your inbreeding is to sires or dams.

 

Dam Female Lines (DFL) - the percentage of 1st and 2nd tier FF# (see FF#) found in the dam’s side (or bottom half) of the pedigree.

 

Duplication Count Comparison, (34/33) appears on the Significant Ancestors report under Siblings tab.  This is a specific term referring to the number of ancestors duplicated, comparing the sire side of the pedigree to the dam side, taken out through the seventh remove.  The figure 34/33 translates to 34 duplicated names in the sires half of the pedigree, and 33 duplicated names in the dams half of the pedigree.  The ideal as put forth in UltiMate 2000© program is to have a balanced ratio (34/34, no variance) with a variable (or difference) of no more than 10 (34/44 or 44/34) for the best results.  Thus in this example we have a near perfect balance between the sire’s half of the pedigree and the dam’s half of the pedigree of the actual horse, or the projected breeding! 

 

Female Family Number (FF#) follows YOF on the Chalkboard Screen and Pedigree report. In the mid-to-late 1800s, the female families that consistently produced winners were each given a designation (or number) that each dam passes on to her foal. The current listing of FF# contains over 124 designations of which 27 predominant families consistently produce superior performers and are considered the most powerful female families in the world.  Split into two groups, they will appear on your pedigrees as green (1ST Tier, most powerful) or red (2nd Tier, second most powerful), those FF#s are:

 

            1st Tier       1S, 1W, 1N, 2S, 2D, 4M, 5H, 8C, 8F, 9C, 9F, 13C, 14C, 21A, 23B

            2nd Tier       1C, 1L, 1K, 3L, 4D, 4R, 5F, 8H, 9E, 9H, 12C, 14F, 16C, 20

 

(These numbers are listed on each Aptitude Chart underneath the dosage information.) Inbreed to these Female Lines whenever possible, attempting to have the sire and dam tracing tail-female to the same family, preferably inbreeding to a great mare within the first 4 to 6 removes.  An analysis of the FF#s within the top and bottom lines of a pedigree truly shows the breeding potential of a mare.

 

Gender of each subject horse is displayed on the Chalkboard Screen and Pedigree report after the name and is represented as for male, and for female (or an abbreviated form of these symbols for geldings and non-productive females).

 

Gender Balancing in the quadrant report is simply the achievement of having an equal number of male and female offspring of the inbred names.  If males carry the major ancestors only, a high risk follows that plodding colts can result. Gender balancing is an important part of breeding superior bloodstock.

 

Grand Sire/ Grand Dam pair percentages, (GS/D: +2%) appears on the Significant Ancestors report under Siblings tab.  A mammal will receive more in type from one grandparent than from the other three.  This refers to the degree of line breeding calculated in a horse’s Grand Sire pair, and is compared the degree of line breeding in the Grand Dam pair.  Thus when the GS/D% equals or approaches a variant of zero, each grandparent has about the same opportunity to provide the resulting foal with an equal amount of hybrid vigor. A negative percentage (i.e. –2%) indicates a stronger Grand Dam influence while a positive percentage (i.e. +2%) indicates a stronger Grand Sire influence.

 

Inbreeding refers to a common ancestor in the first 4 removes that appears in both the sire and the dam.

 

Line Breeding is simply inbreeding in the 5th, 6th, and 7th removes. Duplications further back are not considered line breeding, but are considered coincidental inbreeding.  Line breeding is the equivalent of combining the blood of the dam of the sire (Grand Dam) and the sire of the dam (Broodmare Sire).  The technical jargon goes on, but you get the point. These duplications are illustrated on many of the reports and pedigrees.

 

Nicking (or a ‘nick’) is a term used to describe the above average frequency whereby mares of one given male bloodline would produce above average runners when mated to the sires of another male bloodline.  It should be understood that this is only one of the many factors that play into the analysis of the pedigree. 

 Simplistic pedigree analysis, such as the rating of “nicks,” is just that, too simple to have any great value.  It should be noted that an analysis of nicks should be based on history, not projection.

History shows us that the percentage of graded stakes winners is less than 3% worldwide using this nicking system (sire line / broodmare sire line).  We refer to this as Traditional nicking.  All of these statistics are published weekly in The Bloodhorse and other publications. Traditional nicking is included in UltiMate 2000©.

 

Outcross percentage, (OC: 83%) appears on the Significant Ancestors report under Siblings tab and is based on the ratio of duplicated names to unique (or non-duplicated) names within the fifth, sixth and seventh removes of a given pedigree. Because one has to stop somewhere, the seventh remove is a reasonable genetic limit at which to make the calculation and allows for easier viewing of all the relevant ancestors, which UltiMate 2000© has used to make the calculation. A minimum of 70% is best, however this is just one of the four indices, a balance among all four is desired.

 

Percent of Blood:  Each generation contributes 100% of blood (or genetic influence) divided evenly among the total number of positions (or ancestors) within a given remove. A given sire contributes 50% to the blood. With 4 positions in the second generation (25% each), for a grand sire to have equal influence as the sire, you would need a 2x2 inbreeding, (grand-sire & brood-mare sire being one and the same) or the mating of a half brother to a half sister.  With 64 positions within the sixth generation, each position contributes 1.56% of blood in the foal being analyzed.  If a the same name appears four times in the sixth generation, that inbred horses’ genetic influence is multiplied to 6.24%.  This is the same influence exhibited by a horse present only once in the fourth generation.  If you are a believer in the concept of multiple occurrences of distant ancestors, measurement of the percent of blood will provide a comparative numeric reality, which you may evaluate from one potential mating to another. This can be easily achieved with UltiMate 2000©.

 

Running Numbers (R#) – Computer analysis of the female families has identified those that consistently produced the best runners.  They are: 1-2-3-4-5 (Note:  These are the FF#s, but used as numbers only without any Alpha designation or branching.)The co-mingling of S#s and R#s is needed to produce runners of exceptional ability, much like a catalyst. Using this as a guide, one wants to breed a foal in which the 3rd remove of the pedigree contains a recommended minimum 12.5% of S#s, with a higher percentage (the higher the better) of R#s. 

 

Second Generation Balance, (Gen II: 0) appears on the Significant Ancestors report under Siblings tab and refers to the degree of balance of the line breeding of a horse taken from the second remove only.  Gen II = abs {(PGS, MGS)-(PGD-MGD)} This formula evaluates the outcross percentage of the paternal grand-sire (PGS), the outcross percentage of the maternal grand-sire (MGS) and the outcross percentage of the paternal grand-dam (PGD) and the maternal grand-dam (MGD). The abs (no plus or minus sign) is taken to give a figure that is at its theoretical optimum as it approaches zero and should not exceed 17 (yet as with all general rules, there are exceptions).

 

Sibling Inbreeding (or inbreeding to siblings, that is ½, ¾, and full siblings that cross over both halves of the pedigree). This method works incredibly well. Keep in mind that any inherited qualities will appear in the resulting foal with the same physical strengths or weaknesses as the duplicated ancestors.

 

Sire Female Lines (SFL) - the percentage of 1st and 2nd tier FF#s (see FF#) found in the sire’s side (or top half) of the pedigree. 

 

Sire Numbers (S#) –Computer analysis of the female families has identified those that consistently produced the best sires.  The best sires either traced directly tail-female, to these 5 S#s, and/or were inbred to them.  They are: 3-8-11-12-13-14. (Note:  These are the FF#s, but used as numbers only without any Alpha designation or branching.) The co-mingling of S#s and R#s is needed to produce runners of exceptional ability, much like a catalyst. Using this as a guide, one wants to breed a foal in which the 3rd remove of the pedigree contains a recommended minimum 12.5% of S#s, with a higher percentage (the higher the better) of R#s. 

 

Quadrant refers to a particular branch of the pedigree. For simplicity: Quadrant A=Sire’s sire; Quadrant B=Sire’s dam; Quadrant C=Broodmare Sire; Quadrant D=2nd dam. The best inbreeding typically comes from the B and C quadrants.  A majority of the time the strength of the mare’s pedigree comes from her sire, whereas the sire’s strength comes from his dam.

 

Year of Foaling (YOF) if available, is displayed as part of the name on the Chalkboard Screen/ Closest Name Window, and other reports as a four-digit number (i.e. 1999).

 

 


 

For Consideration:

 

When considering the breeding of thoroughbreds it is important not to ignore the physical comparison, or phenotype*.  Breeding two horses of extreme phenotypes will not produce a proportionately correct foal that possesses a balance of the sire and dam’s physical attributes and other desirable characteristics.

 

Another thought to keep in mind is that while some of the explanations listed here have offered recommended minimums, maximums, and variances, for every rule, there is an exception.

 

*Several critical measurements of a horse are used to determine how it is “balanced” in relationship to its power, stride and body weight (trunk size).  These factors are expressed visually into a dozen groupings based on that relative “balance.”  As the proportions vary, the horses adapt to either distance or speed. One should become familiar with these dozen phenotypes in order to visualize the resulting balance between the mating of a chosen sire and a chosen dam.

 

As Albert Einstein stated, “Imagination is more important than Knowledge.

Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”

 

Any horses mentioned above, or any particular system or

method of breeding, are for reference only!

 

Top of Page

 

Copyright  UltiMate 2000.   All  Rights  Reserved.